De VITO v. KNETTEL


32 Misc.2d 656 (1961)

Joseph De Vito, Appellant, v. William Knettel, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

May 23, 1961


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jules B. St. Germain for appellant. John E. Morris and Louis M. Schachter for respondent.

Concur — DI GIOVANNA, BENJAMIN and DALY, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The purported verdict was recorded as follows: "The jury believes there was negligence on both sides but the greater negligence was contributed by Mr. Knettel, therefore awarding Mr. De Vito the sum of $750." The foregoing does not constitute a general verdict within the meaning of section 458 of the Civil Practice Act and the court should have directed the jury to return for further deliberation and bring in a proper verdict. (Conrey v. Metropolitan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases