HUTCHISON v. SEMLER ET AL


227 Or. 437 (1961)

361 P.2d 803

362 P.2d 704

HUTCHISON v. SEMLER ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed May 10, 1961.

Petition for rehearing denied June 14, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

K.C. Tanner, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Tanner & Carney, Portland.

H.H. Phillips, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Phillips, Coughlin, Buell & Phillips, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Jacob J. Hutchison, from a judgment which the circuit court entered in favor of the four defendants who constitute a partnership that operates a dental laboratory in Portland. The entry of the judgment was preceded by the return of a jury's verdict in the defendants' favor.

Details omitted, the complaint alleges that (1) the plaintiff was employed in the defendants' laboratory as a laboratory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases