BARCROFT ADVERTISING AGENCY v. PAUL WINSTON & CO.

No. 37222.

172 Ohio St. 487 (1961)

BARCROFT, D. B. A. BARCROFT ADVERTISING AGENCY, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PAUL WINSTON & CO. ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 15, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Emanuel Nadlin, for appellants.

Messrs. Harshman, Young, Colvin & Alexander and Mr. George Ruble, for appellees.


The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

ZIMMERMAN, ACTING C. J., RADCLIFF, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and O'NEILL, J J., concur.

ZIMMERMAN, J., sitting in the place and stead of WEYGANDT, C. J.

RADCLIFF, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases