1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 67 N.J.
  5. 67 N.J. Super. 587 (1961)
 

DeLISLE v. CITY OF CAMDEN

67 N.J. Super. 587 (1961)

171 A.2d 346

PETER DeLISLE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. THE CITY OF CAMDEN, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 25, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph M. Nardi, Jr. argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Mr. Samuel L. Supnick, City Counsel, attorney).

Mr. Meyer L. Sakin argued the cause for petitioner-respondent.

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and KILKENNY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

Petitioner appealed to the State Department of Civil Service from the action of the Director of Revenue and Finance of the City of Camden in terminating his service in the position of Cashier at the end of the three-month probationary period provided for by R.S. 11:22-6. His contention was that the notification to him of the unsatisfactory nature of his services was given too late,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases