Order, entered on December 14, 1960, denying plaintiff's motion for the examination of a prospective witness, affirmed.
This case presents anew an example of procedural technicalities being exalted for their own sake and the ultimate purpose of litigation being diverted from the vaunted pursuit of truth.
Plaintiff has been told by the witness, whose examination he seeks and under whom he has worked as a research...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.