BARR v. FRANCKS


70 N.J. Super. 565 (1961)

176 A.2d 243

VIOLET M. BARR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GENERAL ADMINISTRATRIX AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS J. BARR, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EARL P. FRANCKS, AND UDDO & TAORMINA CORPORATION OF VINELAND, AND EDWARD BAILEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 4, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel P. Orlando argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Charles A. Cohen, on the brief).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and NADELL.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

This appeal covers two trials. Plaintiff, individually and as general administratrix as well as administratrix ad prosequendum of the estate of her husband, Thomas J. Barr, deceased, appeals from (1) an order of the Law Division in the first trial of this case granting a new trial; (2) the judgment in the second trial entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff against defendant Francks, and in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases