KING DRUG CO. v. BOWERS

No. 36550.

171 Ohio St. 461 (1961)

KING DRUG CO. OF DAYTON, D. B. A. KING DRUGS, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 1, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Weinberger & Grad, for appellants.

Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. John J. Dilenschneider, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

Appellants contend that Section 5739.10, Revised Code, so far as it permits the use of test checks outside the actual audit period to determine tax liability for sales made during the audit period is unconstitutional; that appellants' records of retail sales in excess of 41 cents were adequate; and that the test checks were unlawful since they were not made of appellants' stores but were made of successors...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases