PORT OF N.Y. AUTHORITY v. HOWELL


68 N.J. Super. 559 (1961)

173 A.2d 310

THE PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH G. HOWELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND DOROTHY FEISTEL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. THE PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANTONIO MAISANO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND M AND D REALTY CO., INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 27, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William V. Breslin argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Mr. Francis B. Rusch, of counsel).

Mr. Russell E. Watson argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Robert S. Tobin, of counsel).

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.

Appellant property owners seek the reversal of judgments entered in the Superior Court, Law Division, in condemnation actions instituted by the Port of New York Authority. The Authority elected, pursuant to the option accorded to it by N.J.S.A. 32:1-132, to proceed under the Airport Act, N.J.S.A. 32:1-35.15. The challenged judgments were entered after an extensive trial without a jury. By order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases