1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 67 N.J.
  5. 67 N.J. Super. 554 (1961)
 

SUTERA v. PROVIDENT INS. CO. OF N.Y.

67 N.J. Super. 554 (1961)

171 A.2d 340

RUTH MILLER SUTERA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PROVIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ANN NASTOI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PROVIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 11, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Leo D. Burrell argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. Fred W. Jung, Jr., attorney).

Mr. Stephen Mongiello argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent Ann Nastoi.

Mr. John E. Wolf argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent Ruth Miller Sutera (Mr. Lawrence Wolfberg and Messrs. Steisel, Gundersdorf, Wolf and Sorrentino, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and KILKENNY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs brought separate actions against the defendant insurance company to recover on its contract to insure Walter Kauger and Grace Kauger (his wife) on a standard automobile liability insurance policy. The actions are predicated on judgments previously recovered in the Hudson County District Court as follows: (a) in favor of plaintiff Ruth Sutera for $1,000, and (b) in favor of plaintiff Ann Nastoi...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases