Appellants' sole contention is that the finding of causal relation is not supported by substantial evidence. As against appellants' experts' denial of causation, claimant's ophthalmologist reported that he found a "healed vascular accident" in the eye, that apparently claimant had suffered a thrombosis of a small retinal vessel and that "there definitely seems to be a causal relationship between the vascular accident * * * and the stress and strain of lifting" — this...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
