DeCOSMO v. FOREMAN


67 N.J. Super. 548 (1961)

171 A.2d 105

EMILY DeCOSMO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CORNELIUS FOREMAN AND ELLEN B. FOREMAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 22, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard S. Semel argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Laurence Semel, attorney).

Mr. Howard G. Stackhouse argued the cause for the respondent.

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, J.A.D.

This action was instituted in the name of the secretary of the attorney for plaintiff, upon a promissory note assigned to her without consideration by a foreign corporation for the sole purpose of bringing this suit. Nothing in this opinion is to be deemed as approval of such arrangements. Although held not unethical, it seems to us that considerations of professional dignity and delicacy should suggest to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases