JAGIELLO v. JAGIELLO


29 Misc.2d 584 (1961)

Carol Jagiello, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Natalie Jagiello and another, Plaintiff, v. Edwin T. Jagiello et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Oneida County.

May 12, 1961


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen J. Pawlinga for defendant. W. Arthur Dwyer for plaintiff.


JOHN H. FARNHAM, J.

Defendant moves under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for the dismissal of plaintiff's complaint on the grounds that neither of the two causes of action alleged in the complaint sets forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. While it is true that the complaint does not set forth specifically different causes of action, it appears that various causes of action are spelled out in the complaint. The pertinent facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases