CARROLL v. CITY OF CAMDEN


34 N.J. 575 (1961)

170 A.2d 417

JOHN J. CARROLL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF CAMDEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, AND THE PLANNING AND HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, A MUNICIPAL AGENCY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 8, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Carlton W. Rowand argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Samuel L. Supnick, Counsel for City of Camden, argued the cause for defendants-respondents.


PER CURIAM.

This is a blighted area case. The appeal is taken from a Superior Court judgment dismissing plaintiff's action challenging so much of the determination as declared plaintiff's property to be within the blighted area. While the appeal was pending in the Appellate Division, we certified it.

Although we feel that plaintiff's violations at trial level of the court rules relative to the institution and prosecution of his action were sufficient in themselves...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases