Per Curiam.
Charges of professional misconduct, unethical practices, deceit and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice have been preferred against the above-named attorney respondent (hereinafter called respondent). His answer set up issues of fact and the matter was referred to a Justice of the Supreme Court (whom we shall refer to as the Hearing Officer) to hear the issues and to report his findings to this court.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.