SHAMROCK TOWING CO. v. HUGHES BROTHERS, INC.


197 F.Supp. 397 (1961)

SHAMROCK TOWING CO., Inc., as owner of THE scows SHAMROCK NO. 75 and THE THOMAS J. GANTLEY, Libelant, v. HUGHES BROTHERS, INC., Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. and Concrete Conduit Corporation, Respondents.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 4, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander, Ash & Schwartz, New York City, for libelant; Edward Ash, New York City, of counsel.

Hill, Rivkin, Middleton, Louis & Warburton, New York City, for respondent Hughes Brothers, Inc.; Henry C. Eidenbach, New York City, of counsel.

Foley & Martin, New York City, for respondent Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.; John H. Hanrahan, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

Macklin, Speer, Hanan & McKernan, New York City, for respondent Concrete Conduit Corp.; Gerald J. McKernan, New York City, of counsel.


DIMOCK, District Judge.

In this admiralty suit, libelant, Shamrock Towing Co., Inc., hereinafter "Shamrock", seeks to recover compensation for damage to its two deck scows, Shamrock No. 75, hereinafter "the No. 75", and Thomas J. Gantley, hereinafter "the Gantley". Shamrock alleges that the damage was caused by the negligence of respondents Concrete Conduit Corporation, hereinafter "Concrete Conduit", and/or Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp., hereinafter "Merritt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases