1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 70 N.J.
  5. 70 N.J. Super. 513 (1961)
 

HARTNACK v. HARTNACK

70 N.J. Super. 513 (1961)

176 A.2d 276

EDNA HARTNACK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANK HARTNACK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 6, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Albert L. Cohn argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. David & Albert L. Cohn, attorneys; Mr. Daniel Crystal, on the brief).

Mr. Bernard G. Goldstein argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and LEONARD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.

The single question presented for decision on this appeal is whether plaintiff's attorneys may, in their own interest, despite their client's abandonment of the appeal, continue the prosecution thereof in an endeavor to reverse the trial court's refusal to grant plaintiff's application for counsel fees and costs and to direct the payment thereof by defendant.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases