No. 73, Docket 27054.

296 F.2d 283 (1961)

St. Clair E. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hazel Lee MILLER, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided November 21, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

St. Clair E. Miller, plaintiff-appellant, pro se.

No appearance for defendant-appellee.

Before CLARK, HINCKS, and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.


This appeal from the denial of appellant's application for counsel to press his action for damages against his wife for procuring his confinement in a state mental institution while sane involves the same issues — parties, appealability, and the discretionary power of the judge in assigning counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) — as in the companion appeal against the hospital superintendent we are deciding herewith. Miller v. Pleasure, 2 Cir., 296 F.2d 283, decided this day. Except as to the one claim of governmental immunity not here available, the chances of any success at all for plaintiff in the action below seem as dubious here as we found them there. The judge exercised sound discretion in denying the application.



1000 Characters Remaining reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases