EULE v. EULE MOTOR SALES


34 N.J. 537 (1961)

170 A.2d 241

ALICE EULE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EULE MOTOR SALES AND RUSSELL A. BOERTZEL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 10, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William V. Breslin argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. William J. Scanlon, on the brief).

Mr. William R. Morrison argued the cause for defendant-respondent Eule Motor Sales (Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs, attorneys; Mr. Kevin M. O'Halloran, on the brief).

Mr. Edward C. Hillis argued the cause for defendant-respondent Russell A. Boertzel (Messrs. Marley, Winkelried & Hillis, attorneys; Mr. Edward C. Hillis, of counsel).


The opinion of the court was delivered by WEINTRAUB, C.J.

The primary issue is whether a wife may sue a partnership of which her husband is a member for injuries negligently inflicted by him. The partnership obtained a summary judgment which the Appellate Division affirmed. 62 N.J.Super. 250 (App. Div. 1960). We granted certification. 33 N.J. 333 (1960).

Plaintiff was a passenger...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases