1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 226 Or.
  5. 226 Or. 335 (1961)
 

BROOKE ET UX v. AMUCHASTEGUI ET UX

226 Or. 335 (1961)

360 P.2d 275

BROOKE ET UX v. AMUCHASTEGUI ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 8, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Spiegel, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Lenske, Spiegel & Spiegel, Portland.

Clifford E. Nelson, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Phelps, Nelson & Shepherd, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, J.

The parties own adjoining residential properties in the city of Portland. Each tract constitutes part of Lots 9 and 10 in Block 22 of the First Addition to Holladay Park Addition in said city. Each of said lots as platted were 100 x 50 feet, with 50 feet fronting on the north side of northeast Clackamas Street, and with their northerly 50 feet abutting the south line of an alley running east and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases