1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 13 Wis.2d
  5. 13 Wis.2d 542 (1961)
 

BECKER v. LA CROSSE

13 Wis.2d 542 (1961)

BECKER, Appellant, v. CITY OF LA CROSSE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 2, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Hale, Skemp, Hanson, Schnurrer & Skemp of La Crosse, and oral argument by Quincy H. Hale.

For the respondent there was a brief by John K. Flanagan, city attorney, and William J. Sauer, assistant city attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Sauer.

HALLOWS, J.

The first contention of plaintiff is the court erred in not changing the answers to questions 3 and 4 from "Not" to "Yes," thereby finding the city had actual and constructive notice of the insufficiency and want of repair of the crosswalk. The testimony on this issue was conflicting and for the jury to determine. The city produced testimony to the effect that it had repaired a hole in the pavement about one foot south of the crosswalk two days before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases