PER CURIAM:
In this appeal, the appellant poses five questions, which collectively amount to a challenge of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a finding of the trial court that he was guilty of murder in the first degree. He concedes that a second degree murder verdict against him would have been appropriate, but claims the State failed to show that the killing was wilful, deliberate and premeditated.
The facts, briefly summarized, were as follows...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
