1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 34 Misc.2d
  5. 34 Misc.2d 20 (1961)
 

DANA v. FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL CORP.

34 Misc.2d 20 (1961)

Arthur W. Dana, Respondent, v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

April 6, 1961

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herman Goldman, Herman M. Brauner and Michael L. Goldstein for appellant. John H. Sherry and Charles F. McMorrow for respondent.

Concur — HECHT, J. P., HOFSTADTER and GOLD, JJ.

Per Curiam.

It has been held that the mere solicitation of business for an out-of-State concern is not enough to constitute doing business in this State (Miller v. Surf Properties, 4 N.Y.2d 475; Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc. v. McCarthy, 290 N.Y. 437; Tauza v. Susquehanna Coal Co., 220 N.Y. 259). In International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington (

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases