Judgment affirmed.
The defendant contends that the court committed reversible error when, upon the selection of nine jurors, it administered the oath to them without awaiting the defendant's acquiescence with respect to all of the twelve jurors to be selected. It clearly appears defendant was advised that if he desired to challange an individual juror he should do so when the juror was called and before he was sworn (Code Crim. Pro., § 369), and that defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
