1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 118 S.E.2d
  5. 118 S.E.2d 411 (1961)
 

STATE v. BRIGHT

No. 1.

118 S.E.2d 411 (1961)

254 N.C. 226

STATE v. Horace BRIGHT.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 1, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LeRoy Scott and Carter & Ross, Washington, N. C., for defendant-appellant.

T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen., and G. A. Jones, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The sufficiency of the evidence to support the charges was not challenged by motion to nonsuit or for directed verdict. To secure a new trial it is necessary for appellant, by proper assignment of error, Hunt v. Davis, 248 N.C. 69, 102 S.E.2d 405, to show prejudicial error. Barefoot v. Rulnick, 252 N.C. 483, 113 S.E.2d 921

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases