GALLI v. RE-AL BRAZILIAN INT. AIRLINES


29 Misc.2d 499 (1961)

Antonio Galli, Plaintiff, v. Re-Al Brazilian International Airlines, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

January 31, 1961


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Condon & Forsyth (George N. Tompkins, Jr., of counsel), for defendant. Theodore Charnas for plaintiff.


HAROLD TESSLER, J.

Motion by defendant, pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for judgment dismissing the amended complaint upon the ground that the court does not have jurisdiction of the subject of the action.

The action is brought to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff when one of defendant's aircraft, upon which plaintiff was traveling, was forced to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases