ALAMANCE INDUS. v. CHESTERFIELD HOSIERY MILL

17849

239 S.C. 287 (1961)

122 S.E.2d 648

ALAMANCE INDUSTRIES, Respondent, v. CHESTERFIELD HOSIERY MILL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

November 14, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ney B. Steele, Esq., of Chesterfield, for Appellant.

Messrs. H.F. Bell, of Chesterfield, and Eaton, Bell, Hunt & Seltzer, of Charlotte, N.C., for Respondent.


November 14, 1961.

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

The sole question presented in this appeal is whether the Circuit Judge erred in refusing to allow the defendant to amend its answer by setting up a separate defense or counterclaim for fraud and deceit.

Suit was commenced in November, 1959, alleging a cause of action for debt in the amount of $695.00 allegedly due plaintiff under the terms of a written patent license agreement. Defendant duly filed answer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases