GREENBERG'S SONS v. PETER PAN FUR CO.


33 Misc.2d 453 (1961)

N. & E. Greenberg's Sons, Inc., Respondent, v. Peter Pan Fur Co., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

April 20, 1961


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph J. Einhorn and Patricia S. Teitel for appellant. Marvin E. Kramer and Ronald Podolsky for defendant and third-party plaintiff-respondent.

Concur — HECHT, J. P., HOFSTADTER and GOLD, JJ.


Per Curiam.

While a defendant in a negligence action may implead its insurance broker who allegedly breached his agreement to provide full insurance coverage, it was error for the trial court to deny the third-party defendant's motion to sever the main and third-party actions, as the third-party defendant would be subjected to some prejudice if both actions were tried together before the same jury (Thornton v. City of New York, 20...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases