LEE v. STATE

[No. 128, September Term, 1960.]

224 Md. 260 (1961)

167 A.2d 595

LEE v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 8, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur L. Rhoads, Jr., for appellant.

Mary Arabian, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General, Saul A. Harris and Norman Polski, State's Attorney and Assistant State's Attorney, respectively, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and MARBURY, JJ.


PER CURIAM:

The appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree in the Criminal Court of Baltimore by the court, sitting without a jury.

The only question raised is the sufficiency of the evidence. The appellant admits he fatally stabbed the deceased, but claims the circumstances of the killing failed to show that it was wilful, deliberate and premeditated. There is no merit in the contention.

The evidence, and proper inferences from the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases