DeNIKE v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES RET. SYSTEM OF N.J.


34 N.J. 430 (1961)

170 A.2d 12

MATTIE DeNIKE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC [STATE] EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 10, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Theodore I. Botter, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Mr. Franklin W. Kielb argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.


The opinion of the court was delivered by HANEMAN, J.

We granted certification to review the Appellate Division. 33 N.J. 389 (1960).

Subject to the qualifying comments which here follow, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the comprehensive opinion of the Appellate Division, DeNike v. Board of Trustees, etc., Retirement System, 62 N.J.Super...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases