SEEFELDT v. KESKE


14 Wis.2d 438 (1961)

SEEFELDT, Respondent, v. KESKE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 31, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of Lueck & Skupniewitz of Beaver Dam, and for the respondent on the brief of Swan, Strub & Woodworth of Beaver Dam.


CURRIE, J.

Defendant lessor contends on this appeal that it is well established by the decisions of this court that an option granted to a lessee to renew a lease, as distinguished from an option to extend, requires the execution of a new lease if the option is exercised. Since no new lease had been executed, it is argued that no option to purchase existed when plaintiff lessee attempted to exercise the option in the summer of 1960.

Some states do not distinguish...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases