MATTER OF FRANGELINE


14 A.D.2d 420 (1961)

In the Matter of the Probate of The Will of Luigi Frangeline, Deceased. Joseph Frangeline et al., Appellants; Vera Ross et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

November 30, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phelps, Gray, Mansour & Hewitt (Salem G. Mansour of counsel), for Joseph Frangeline, appellant.

Merino & Vitch (R. Robert Marino of counsel), for Alfonso Di Gregorio and another, appellants.

Orr, Brydges, Orr & Dowd (John G. Dowd of counsel), for William M. Orr, respondent.

Findlay, Hackett, Reid & Wattengel (Paul H. Reid, Jr., of counsel), for Vera Ross, respondent.

All concur. Present — WILLIAMS, P. J., BASTOW, GOLDMAN, HALPERN and HENRY, JJ.


WILLIAMS, P. J.

This appeal is from a decree of Surrogate's Court admitting the will of the deceased to probate. The controversy centered around the question of whether deceased was mentally capable of making the will in question. The jury decided that he was.

The appellant Joseph Frangeline, a brother of the deceased, in an effort to prove mental incapacity sought, through his trial counsel, to question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases