FARRINGTON v. FAIRFIELD

Docket No. 24802.

194 Cal.App.2d 237 (1961)

16 Cal. Rptr. 119

CHARLES M. FARRINGTON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSEPH W. FAIRFIELD, Defendant and Respondent; EVERT L. HAGAN, Movant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

July 25, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Evert L. Hagan, in pro. per., for Movant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Ethelyn F. Black and Max H. Gewirtz for Defendant and Respondent.


FORD, J.

This is an appeal by Evert L. Hagan from an order denying his motion that he be substituted as petitioner in the place of Charles M. Farrington in a mandamus proceeding.

The record discloses that on March 10, 1959, a judgment was entered in which it was ordered that the respondent Fairfield permit Farrington "to examine and make abstracts from the stock register, minutes of proceedings of the directors and shareholders and books of account of Benedict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases