BRINSON v. SACKS

No. 36829.

172 Ohio St. 256 (1961)

BRINSON v. SACKS, WARDEN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 10, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John Brinson, in propria persona.

Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

A parole violator is not entitled to credit for the periods of his declared violations, and, therefore, petitioner has not served the maximum sentence imposed and is not entitled to his release by habeas corpus. Ex parte Gosier, 171 Ohio St. 403; Rigg v. Correction Dept., Parole Board Div., 170 Ohio St. 347.

Petitioner remanded to custody...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases