This appeal presents only an issue of fact. Appellant earnestly contends that there is not sufficient evidence to warrant a jury's finding that he was guilty of possession or control of an unregistered distillery, the possession of 105 gallons of non-tax paid whiskey or of the other violations charged. Appellant contends that there was no substantial evidence to connect him with possession or control beyond his...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.