1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 14 Wis.2d
  5. 14 Wis.2d 397 (1961)
 

SEYBOLD v. BURKE

14 Wis.2d 397 (1961)

SEYBOLD, Appellant, v. BURKE and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 3, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by O'Melia & Kaye of Rhinelander, and oral argument by Walter F. Kaye.

For the respondent Beatrice Burke there was a brief and oral argument by Forest W. Rodd of Rhinelander.

For the respondents Stuart there was a brief by Everis H. Reid of Hurley, attorney, and Wright & Zinn of Ironwood, Michigan, of counsel, and oral argument by Ivan D. Wright.

FAIRCHILD, J.

1. The boundary described by the deeds. The circuit court found that the true common boundary between the Burke and Seybold lands is a line parallel to the quarter line as shown in the survey of F. R. Wincentsen, and that the quarter line bears south 1°, 55' east from the accepted center quarter corner of section 14. A map of the Wincentsen survey was attached to the judgment.

A government...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases