DIMMICK v. ALVAREZ

Docket No. 19237.

196 Cal.App.2d 211 (1961)

16 Cal. Rptr. 308

FLOYD DIMMICK et al., Appellants, v. JOSE A. ALVAREZ et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

October 11, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson, Thorne, Speed & Bamford and John T. Thorne for Appellants.

Campbell, Custer, Warburton and Britton, Stanley Clark, Hoge, Fenton, Jones & Appel, Edwin D. Jones, Jr., George A. Strong and Ropers, Majeski & Kane for Respondents.


KAUFMAN, P.J.

Plaintiffs, Floyd Dimmick and his wife, Lillian, appeal from a judgment in their favor entered on a jury verdict, in their actions for property damage and personal injuries, and from the denial of their motion for a new trial. They contend that a new trial on the issue of damages should be granted to plaintiff, Lillian Dimmick, as the damages awarded are inadequate as a matter of law, and that both plaintiffs are entitled to a new trial because of conversation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases