1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 70 N.J.
  5. 70 N.J. Super. 322 (1961)
 

STATE v. HUBBS

70 N.J. Super. 322 (1961)

175 A.2d 443

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH FRANCIS HUBBS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 28, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Seymour Margulies argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. Philip J. Blanda, Jr., attorney; Messrs. Levy, Lemken & Margulies, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. William D. Danberry, Middlesex County Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Edward J. Dolan, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and LABRECQUE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

These are consolidated appeals from (1) a sentence of defendant by the Middlesex County Court to imprisonment upon a jury conviction of embezzlement contrary to N.J.S. 2A:102-5; and (2) the denial of defendant's motion for a new trial and in arrest of judgment and from an earlier municipal court order which bound defendant over for grand jury action on a different charge.

Defendant and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases