CHAPMAN v. LOCAL 104 OF INTERNAT'L ASS'N OF MACHINISTS

Civ. A. No. 997-H.

199 F.Supp. 186 (1961)

Roy CHAPMAN, Emmett Aills, Otho A. Ray, William R. Cox, Carl Grubbs, Byrd W. Doss, Freeman Sargent, R. M. McCrosky, J. E. Cobb, and F. M. Warren, Plaintiffs, v. LOCAL 104 OF the INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS, and The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. West Virginia, at Huntington.

November 6, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Earl Pratt, Pratt, Kennedy & Moore, Ironton, Ohio, Itkin, Roberts & Greenbaum, New York City, and Henry L. Max, Huntington, W. Va., for plaintiffs.

Russell C. Dunbar, Dodrill, Barrett, Dunbar & Chafin, Huntington, W. Va., for defendant Local 104 of the Internatl. Assn. of Machinists.

Amos A. Bolen and Edwin W. Conley, Fitzpatrick, Huddleston & Bolen, Huntington, W. Va., for defendant Chesapeake and O. Ry. Co.


HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

This is an action for declaratory judgment, an injunction and damages, brought by ten white machinist helpers in their individual capacities, against Local 104 of the International Association of Machinists, of which each is a member, and against the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, by whom each has been employed. The ultimate and important question for decision is whether this court has original jurisdiction to hear a railway...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases