1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.H.
  4. 103 N.H.
  5. 103 N.H. 247 (1961)
 

ROCHESTER v. BARCOMB

No. 4912.

103 N.H. 247 (1961)

ROCHESTER v. ALBERT E. BARCOMB & a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Decided April 4, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred W. Hall, Jr., city solicitor (by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

Beamis & Davis (Mr. Davis orally), for the defendants.

BLANDIN, J.

I. Counsel for the defendants states in his brief that they "are not attacking the validity of the ordinance on procedural grounds, but are attacking it on substantive grounds." The essence of their claim on this phase of the matter is that the ordinance bore no relationship to the public interest and welfare nor did it contain a comprehensive zoning plan for the community, which are essential to the validity of the enactment. Kimball v. Blanchard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases