MOYER ET UX v. RAMSEYER ET AL


226 Or. 122 (1961)

359 P.2d 407

MOYER ET UX v. RAMSEYER ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed February 15, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Latourette, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Latourette & Latourette and Robert P. Dickinson, Portland.

William T. Hollen, Newport, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Adams, Hollen & Poling, Newport.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.


REVERSED WITH DIRECTIONS.

GOODWIN, J.

The plaintiffs Moyer appeal from a decree which reformed a contract as prayed in an equitable answer to Moyers' action at law for damages arising out of the defendants Ramseyers' inability to convey certain interests in lands described in a written contract.

The parties will be referred to by their last names. Both parties include husband and wife. Moyer is in the pole and piling business. Mr. Moyer was his own...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases