STAVISKY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

No. 307, Docket 26473.

291 F.2d 48 (1961)

Meyer J. STAVISKY and Theresa Z. Stavisky, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided June 5, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Asher Lans and Stanley N. Queler, New York City, for petitioner.

Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Robert N. Anderson and Fred Youngman, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before HAND, MEDINA and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.


HAND, Circuit Judge.

This case comes up on a petition by taxpayers, husband and wife (whom we shall call Stavisky), to review an order of the Tax Court allowing a payment to Sutro only as a long-term capital loss, deductible subject to the limitations of § 117(d) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, and not as an "ordinary loss" deductible under § 23(e), 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 23(e) 117(d) (2). The facts are as follows.

On September 19, 1950, Stavisky...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases