1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 65 N.J.
  5. 65 N.J. Super. 262 (1961)
 

STATE v. WINES

65 N.J. Super. 262 (1961)

167 A.2d 650

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HARRY WINES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ANTHONY PALUMBO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 30, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward F. Hamill, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Lawrence A. Whipple, Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney).

Mr. A. Donald McKenzie, Jr. argued the cause for the appellant Harry Wines (Messrs. McKenzie & Hehl, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph Moritz argued the cause for the appellant Anthony Palumbo.

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, J.A.D.

Following the reversal of their previous convictions (State v. Wines, 47 N.J.Super. 235 (App. Div. 1957)) defendants were again convicted, and again they appeal.

They contend the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. No purpose would be served by recounting the details of the evidence. Suffice it to say that we have examined it carefully...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases