STATE, EX REL. FITZTHUM v. TURINSKY

No. 36772.

172 Ohio St. 148 (1961)

THE STATE, EX REL. FITZTHUM ET AL., APPELLEES, v. TURINSKY ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 19, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas L. Corogin, for appellees.

Mr. Leslie E. Meyer, prosecuting attorney, for appellants.


BELL, J.

It is contended by relators that there has been a common-law dedication of the roads in question, and that the township trustees are required by Sections 5571.02 and 5571.12, Revised Code, to maintain and repair them, irrespective of a formal acceptance of such dedication by the Board of County Commissioners.

Respondents, on the other hand, contend that under the provisions of Section 6886, General Code, which was in effect at the time of the recording...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases