BRILL v. BRILL


10 N.Y.2d 308 (1961)

Ruby Brill, Respondent, v. Joseph Brill et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 16, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacob W. Friedman and Abraham J. Brill for appellants.

Irving I. Erdheim and Louise Gruner for respondent.

Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and FOSTER concur with Judge VAN VOORHIS; Judge BURKE dissents in an opinion in which Chief Judge DESMOND concurs.


VAN VOORHIS, J.

The action is for declaratory judgment determining that the defendants, Joseph Brill and Beverly Stiansen, are not husband and wife for the reason that Brill had been married to plaintiff and the Mexican decree of divorce between them alleged in the complaint is invalid. Judgment is asked annulling the subsequent marriage between Brill and Stiansen and directing that she be enjoined from using...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases