1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 70 N.J.
  5. 70 N.J. Super. 234 (1961)
 

SCHULMAN v. MALE

70 N.J. Super. 234 (1961)

175 A.2d 450

BENJAMIN SCHULMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. RAYMOND F. MALE, COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND TRUSTEE OF THE ONE PER CENT FUND, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 31, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jack Mandell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Roskein, Kronisch, Pelzenberg & Mandell, attorneys).

Mr. Theodore I. Botter argued the cause for respondent (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Before Judges KILKENNY, HERBERT and COLLESTER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KILKENNY, J.A.D.

This is a workmen's compensation case wherein the petitioner, Benjamin Schulman, sought total disability benefits from the One Per Cent Fund (N.J.S.A. 34:15-95). The then Acting Commissioner of Labor and Industry dismissed plaintiff's petition on the ground that the claim was barred by N.J.S.A. 34:15-95(c) and (d). The dismissal was affirmed by the Essex County Court, upon a finding that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases