KRAUSE v. HARTWIG


14 Wis.2d 281 (1961)

KRAUSE, Respondent, v. HARTWIG and wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 3, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Smith, Miller & Eberhardt of Jefferson, and oral argument by Richard C. Smith.

For the respondent there was a brief by Skinner & Thauer of Watertown, and oral argument by Richard C. Thauer.


DIETERICH, J.

The sole issue is whether there is a substantial issue of fact to be tried.

Reformation is an equitable action and the main object of equitable jurisdiction is to effectuate the intentions of the parties to the instrument in question. A mutual mistake made by the parties to the instrument which would defeat such intentions should be corrected in equity for the purpose of putting in effect such an intention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases