METZ v. GREAT A. & P. TEA CO.


30 Misc.2d 258 (1961)

Florence H. Metz et al., Plaintiffs, v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Kings County.

May 17, 1961


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander Chananau and Harry A. Gair for plaintiffs. Terhune, Gibbons & Mulvihill (George I. Ryan of counsel), for defendant.


J. IRWIN SHAPIRO, J.

Motion by plaintiffs, husband and wife, to set aside a verdict in their favor upon the ground that it is inadequate, and upon all the grounds specified under section 549 of the Civil Practice Act, except excessiveness.

The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the following language:

"THE FOREMAN: Number 1, we have unanimously voted for the plaintiffs as against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases