1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 13 Wis.2d
  5. 13 Wis.2d 275 (1961)
 

DYKSTRA v. CUDAHY BROTHERS CO.

13 Wis.2d 275 (1961)

DYKSTRA and another, Appellants, v. CUDAHY BROTHERS COMPANY and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 4, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Brach & Wheeler, and oral argument by Fred W. Wheeler and by Roger W. Hoffman, all of Racine.

For the respondents there was a brief by Whaley & Whaley of Racine, and oral argument by Vilas H. Whaley and John W. Whaley.

FAIRCHILD, J.

1. Form of order. "No order granting a new trial in the interest of justice shall be valid or effective, unless the reasons that prompted the court to make such order are set forth in detail therein."1

We have held that, "if the reasons for granting a new trial in the interest of justice are set forth in detail by the trial court in a memorandum opinion, the order itself will comply with the statute if it incorporates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases