TINSMAN v. PARSEKIAN


65 N.J. Super. 217 (1961)

167 A.2d 407

CHARLES TINSMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NED PARSEKIAN, ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND SAFETY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 23, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jack Pincus argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Pincus, Shamy & Sheehan, attorneys; Mr. George J. Shamy, of counsel).

Mr. John C. Stockel argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and KILKENNY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KILKENNY, J.A.D.

Plaintiff's personal injury, automobile negligence suit against the Acting Director of the Division of Motor Vehicles, under the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Law, N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 et seq., was dismissed on defendant's motion before trial. The Law Division ruled that, under the stipulated facts, the conditions precedent to a suit against the Director under N.J.S.A. 39:6-78 had not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases