1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 13 Wis.2d
  5. 13 Wis.2d 15 (1961)
 

MAIN v. CAMERON

13 Wis.2d 15 (1961)

MAIN, by Guardian, and another, Plaintiffs, v. CAMERON and another, Defendants and Appellants: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 7, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Dougherty, Campbell, Brennan & Steil of Janesville, and oral argument by James E. Brennan.

For the respondent there was a brief by Roberts, Boardman, Suhr, Bjork & Curry of Madison, and oral argument by Walter M. Bjork.

FAIRCHILD, J.

Repeated use of an automobile by one who is not the owner with the owner's knowledge of such use permits an inference that the owner had given consent, express or implied, to the other's use of the automobile.1

It is conceded here that there was no express consent, and no sufferance by Vorel of repeated use of the particular automobile (nor any other Vorel automobile) by Cameron.

Appellant cites four decisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases